Mississippi Criminal Defense Law Blog
Founded and Published by Kevin W. Frye, Attorney at Law with contributions from James B. Justice of Justice & Alexander, P.A.
Mississippi Criminal Defense Law Blog

Underage Drinking: Risk Factors

I just ran across this video that discusses risk factors relating to children and underage drinking on Slate (one of my favorite news oriented websites).  While the video didn't provide me with any new information on the subject, I thought it was interesting nonetheless.  As I was watching, I was thinking about the success of the BASICS alcohol counseling program at Ole Miss - see my previous post on the topic here.

Mississippi Criminal Defense Law Blog in the News

Last week the Oxford Eagle's Alyssa Schnugg raised the profile of this blog and others with her story on blogging. Over the last two days, various regional news outlets have published versions of her story: see the Clarion Ledger; the Natchez Democrat; WREG in Memphis; Fox Ten in Mobile; and WXVT in Greenville.  Thanks again to Alyssa!

A DUI Lawyer: Kind of...

I stopped in Oxford's Uptown/High Point Coffee this evening and found myself in a depressing conversation about a particular Mississippi lawyer and DUI defense. An acquaintance I often see in Oxford, let's call him Mr. X, asked me what I do for a living. When I told him I was a lawyer, and that I practice criminal law, he explained his DUI defense experience to me.  Without revealing information about Mr. X or his lawyer, suffice it to say he was not happy with the representation. 

An aside.  The reality of criminal law practice is that some clients are understandably disappointed in the outcome of their cases - being accused of a crime is stressful, and a conviction or guilty plea is without doubt a difficult experience.  So, it isn't abnormal to hear complaints about criminal defense lawyers.  But, Mr. X's story stood out to me as something different from the normal frustrations and disappointments experienced by those in the criminal law system.

Interestingly, Mr. X didn't protest "I was innocent" or explain how the court system was wrong.  Instead, he explained the poor representation he received from his lawyer and related the enormous fee he paid for that representation.  The poor representation included the lawyer not knowing the details of Mr. X's DUI arrest when he appeared in court and the lawyer disparaging local law enforcement in open court, both to the obvious detriment of Mr. X's defense. The fee Mr. X paid for the "representation", to my knowledge, is more than double the fee charged by most lawyers who practice DUI defense in the Oxford area.

I've been reflecting on this conversation for a few hours now, and I'm still not sure what to say.  I related earlier that I found the conversation depressing.  That's because I do not believe that Mr. X's experience with his lawyer was typical.  The lawyers I practice with in Oxford are, for the most part, skilled and conscientious advocates.  They are professionals, and they represent their clients to the best of their ability.  (I trust that they would say the same thing about me.)  I guess all I can say is that Mr. X deserved better.

A DUI Story: Kind of...

I've heard numerous Oxford DUI stories over the years, from friends, strangers and clients, but this DUI tale is unique.  Thanks to Lawrence Taylor of the DUI Blog for bringing Jeff Brown's story to our attention.  Jeff relates in this video documentary (interesting but a little long) his experience of receiving a DUI while walking a bicycle and his journey through the legal system in Ohio.  Jeff also cites a number of statistics and attacks MADD (more on MADD attacks in a future post).  Like I said, the story is interesting, but I don't vouch for his statistical accuracy.  Enjoy!

"Pedestrian" at OxfordMississippi.com

I've got a new post up today over at OxfordMississippi.com relating a story from my childhood, a decent story I think, and discussing the perils of being a pedestrian in Oxford.  Enjoy!

Oxford Eagle on Blogging and the Mississippi Criminal Defense Law Blog

Yesterday the Oxford Eagle published an article discussing blogs and blogging, including the Mississippi Criminal Defense Law Blog. The article can be found here. It includes the following quote from me about publishing this blog:
"The information exchange with other bloggers helps me stay current with national trends in criminal law,” [I] said. “ I want to provide a forum for discussion of those issues. Second, I understand that many people find the criminal justice system mysterious — they don’t know how the system works and don’t know what to expect when they or a friend are charged with a crime. I believe that lawyers should work to make the legal process as transparent and accessible as possible, and I believe I am doing my part by publishing the blog."
That pretty much sums up why I'm spending time here each day.  I hope you readers are finding the posts to be interesting and informative. One important note about the blog that I mentioned to Alyssa but that didn't make the story: the information found here is not a substitute for retaining a lawyer, but I hope readers gain a better understanding of the law and the processes of the criminal justice system. Thanks again to Alyssa for the story.

Oxford Police Department v. The Daily Mississippian

An interesting story today from The Daily Mississippian's (DM) Paul Quinn, who has just started his own blog while the DM is taking a finals break.  Paul explains how the DM and fellow reporter Victoria Howell have taken a stand against revealing notes and sources to the Oxford Police Department (OPD) in an ongoing investigation into an April 25th traffic accident.  An excerpt:

The day our story ran a lieutenant sent me a text message asking if I could help him get with Ms. Howell. When I talked with her and the DM advisor’s they told Victoria not to speak with the police. We did not want our sources to think that we are an arm of the law, but that we are can be trusted by our sources.

After explaining, via text, to the officer she could not help the investigation I was informed OPD would get a grand jury subpoena in order to obtain the information they wanted...


Paul's full story, which I recommend, is here.  He goes on to explain that after seeking legal counsel, the DM chose not to provide OPD with any information, and are now waiting to see what will happen and hoping the OPD will "back down".  This is an interesting read, and brings to mind the high profile jailing of New York Times reporter Judith Miller who refused to testify to a grand jury investigating the leak of the name of then undercover CIA agent Valerie Plame.  Certainly this case would not warrant such drastic action by our local courts, but it is interesting just the same.  I trust that Paul will keep us informed as this story develops.

Boating While Intoxicated

A few weeks ago I posted "DUI's are for famous people too..." noting NBA star Carmelo Anthony's DUI arrest.  Today, we have more celebrity DUI news.  Sort of.  The NFL's Cedric Benson has been charged with Boating While Intoxicated (BWI?) in Texas.  An excerpt from the AP:

Chicago Bears running back Cedric Benson was charged with failing a sobriety test while operating a 30-foot boat, then resisting arrest before being hit with pepper spray and dragged ashore by officers.

Benson faces charges of boating while intoxicated and resisting arrest after the incident Saturday night on Lake Travis, Travis County Sheriff’s Department spokesman Roger Wade said Sunday.

Benson was released from jail early Sunday on a $14,500 bond. The charges are class B misdemeanors, each punishable by up to six months in jail and a $2,000 fine. A call to Benson’s agent was not immediately returned.

Benson was operating the boat with 15 passengers aboard when he was stopped by a Lower Colorado River Authority officer for a random safety inspection. He failed a field sobriety test on the officer’s boat and was uncooperative when the officer tried to take him ashore, the authority said.

The full story can be found here.  Texas criminal law blogger Jamie Spencer is already reacting to the story - see his posts, at the Austin Criminal Defense Lawyer discussing the unfortunate characterization of Benson's past legal troubles here, and at the Austin DWI Lawyer discussing the so called "float test" given to Benson in an attempt to determine whether he was intoxicated here.  I'll leave it to Jamie to keep us up to date as the case progresses. 

For interested in-state boaters, I thought I'd post some information about Mississippi's Alcohol Boating Safety Act.  You can see some text of the Act below - the first thing to jump out at me is the threshold BAC of .10% which is higher than the .08% threshold for a DUI.  Also noteworthy, but not reproduced here, is the fact that a BWI conviction results in significantly lower penalties than those resulting from a DUI conviction.  The Act states the following:

(1) It is unlawful for any person to operate a watercraft on the public waters of this state who:

      (a) Is under the influence of intoxicating liquor;

      (b) Is under the influence of any other substance which has impaired such person's ability to operate a watercraft; or

      (c) Has ten one-hundredths percent (.10%) or more by weight volume of alcohol in the person's blood based upon milligrams of alcohol per one hundred (100) cubic centimeters of blood as shown by a chemical analysis of such person's breath, blood or urine administered as authorized by this chapter.

Mississippi Code Annotated, Section 59-23-7(1).

Regional Criminal Law News: Cause of Death Investigated

The weekly roundup of criminal law news from Lafayette County, Marshall County, Panola County and Union County.

This week, The South Reporter filed
this story detailing the re-investigation of the death of Frank Alexander, who died in Marshall County on August 26, 2007.  Staff Writer Sue Watson notes the following:

According to Kelly McMillen with the sheriff’s office, deputies were called to the residence and coroner John Garrison also came to the house and pronounced Alexander dead, apparently of natural causes, according to the coroner’s report.

The body of the deceased was transported to a funeral home in Memphis, Tenn., and then from there carried to Jackson for autopsy, McMillen said. After autopsy, Alexander’s body was returned to Tennessee for burial.

On September 4, 2007, members of the Alexander family from Marshall County and St. Louis, said they were not satisfied with the determination of the cause of death in the autopsy report and asked the sheriff’s department to launch an investigation, Dickerson said.

McMillen said he spoke with Dr. Stephen Haynes [sic], with the state medical examiner’s office in Jackson, discussing with him the families concerns about the cause and manner of death.

“During the conversation, I was advised by the medical examiner that Mr. Alexander’s body had to be exhumed for more tissue samples and testing,” McMillen said. “Then I went to work on getting an order to exhume the body in Shelby County.”

It took six months to get the order to exhume the body and it was removed from the grave in a cemetery on Horn Lake Road in Memphis, Tenn., on March 11.

The involvement of Dr. Hayne in this case is important because his qualifications as a forensic pathologist, or lack thereof, have been recently and publicly called into question.  The Clarion Ledger has filed this report, and the issue has been discussed at length on folo with these highlights: Mississippi Innocence Project goes for Hayne's Medical License; Yet Another Stephen Hayne Horror Story; and Fixing the State Medical Examiner Mess.  Good luck to the Marshall County Sheriff's Department in solving the case, and lets hope they get some help from a qualified medical examiner.

Officers Rewarded for DUI Arrests

Mississippi law enforcement officers will be honored in Jackson today in relation to DUI enforcement.  This news from a short blurb in the Clarion Ledger, which states:

Nearly 70 officers from more than 20 departments statewide will be honored at [sic] today for their efforts in DUI enforcement.

The event begins at 11 a.m. at the Jackson Hotel, 1000 E. County Line Road, in salons A & B.

I wish the Clarion Ledger would have provided more information.  Who sponsors the event?  What awards are given?  I posted earlier this week on my thoughts about initiating a sober ride home program in Oxford, so my position on drunk driving is known.  But, I couldn't help but wonder if Mississippi law enforcement officers are honored for doing their job in other ways - awards for the most speeding tickets or the most accidents investigated?  Law enforcement officers are expected to protect all of us and enforce all laws, and they do a fine job.  It's just that special awards for DUI enforcement, for an intentional focus on one type of offender, make me cringe.

Can the prosecutor read my text messages?

In every criminal case the defendant is entitled to "discovery" from the prosecutor.  Discovery is the term lawyers use to describe the evidence gathered in the case against the defendant, which can include witness statements, investigation reports, audio and video recordings, and a myriad of other documents which tend to prove or disprove the defendant's guilt.  In many cases the prosecutor will subpoena phone records in an effort to establish an important fact - an example being that the defendant spoke with a certain person on a certain date and at a certain time.  The prosecutor's use of phone records is limited, in that the records generally only show that a call was placed or received, when it occurred, and how long it lasted.  Text messages are another story. 

Today, Slate published
this article on the availability of text message data from various wireless carriers.  The article focuses on the sex scandal currently surrounding Detroit's Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick.  An excerpt:

If you delete an old text message, can someone (or his lawyer) still find it?

Probably not—although there are exceptions. Most cell phone carriers don't permanently save the enormous amount of text-message data that is sent between users every day. AT&T Wireless, for example, says it keeps sent text messages for 48 hours only—after that, they are wiped off the system. Sprint, on the other hand, keeps messages on its server for approximately two weeks. A court order could force a carrier to retain certain messages as part of an ongoing investigation, but it would probably be impossible to get the contents of a 2002 text message from most cell phone companies.

But as the Detroit Free Press noted after it uncovered the first trove of messages in January, Kilpatrick got in trouble because he used a government-issued SkyTel pager. SkyTel—which does much of its business through government and corporate contracts
—offers message archiving as one of its key features.

I can think of many scenarios in criminal cases where text message data could be very damaging to a defendant.  Unlike typical phone records, records of text messages may allow the prosecutor to actually see what was said by and to the defendant.  The lesson?  Be careful what you say in a text message, your words might be around for some time.

Local News: Arrests on Double Decker Weekend

This past weekend Oxford hosted the Thirteenth Annual Double Decker Arts Festival.  Not only did the Festival attract thousands to enjoy the great art, food and music, it also brought more than fifty arrests.  The Oxford Police Department made numerous arrests, including: sixteen for DUI; twenty-two for public drunkenness; multiple for minor in possession (MIP); multiple for resisting arrest and/or disorderly conduct; two for open container of alcohol; two for possession of a controlled substance; and, two for simple assault. 

I participated in the Double Decker festivities as well as the Ole Miss baseball double-header and had a great weekend in the process.  Double Decker weekend highlights all that Oxford has to offer, and is more than deserving of its fame among locals and visitors alike.  Maybe Oxford's event organizers could take a good idea from our almost neighbors in Texas for next year's Double Decker... 

I ran across
this post today on the Frisco DWI Lawyer & Attorney Blog which details a Texas city's efforts to curb drinking and driving.  The City of Freeport, near Houston, now requires public event organizers who host events offering alcohol to provide a sober ride home to those attending the event.  I agree with Hunter that a requirement for all events may be a bit overboard, but the concept is great.  Although a good portion of my practice involves representing clients charged with DUI's, I would certainly support an organized plan like this one in Oxford.  As I tell all my clients and friends "safety first, but don't hesitate to call if you need me."

Oxford sure is grand...

...read all about it!  I'd like to refer you to a new favorite blog of mine which covers a topic other than criminal law - that being good ol' Oxford, Mississippi.  Recently, I became a contributor to OxfordMississippi.com, a new blog covering all things wonderful about Oxford, written by others who love the town as much as I do.  I'll be posting some law related stories there, like the one I did last week titled Oxford Has Some Weird Laws...", as well as some simple commentaries on my life in Oxford away from work.  I won't be re-posting those stories here, but I'll try to remember to send you on over when something interesting pops up.  Enjoy! 

Regional Criminal Law News: Alleged Murder in Panola County

The weekly roundup of criminal law news from Lafayette County, Marshall County, Panola County and Union County. 

Last week was highlighted by charges of murder and aggravated assault (see my previous post describing the elements of aggravated assault
here) arising out of a fight in Panola County.  A preliminary story by Billy Davis of The Panolian can be found hereThe Panolian's report of actions taken in Batesville Municipal Court can be found here.

I will continue to follow the alleged murder in Panola County and will bring additional information as it becomes available.

Blogrolling

I wanted to take a minute to thank the following bloggers and blogs for their support in either adding the Mississippi Criminal Defense Law Blog to their pages or sending along useful information, or both.

Additionally, here are some interesting blogs which I have been following lately:

If I missed you, please email me and I'll add you to the next edition of Blogrolling.

What are the Alcohol Rules on Campus - I'm Confused...?

I field numerous questions about alcohol laws and rules on the University of Mississippi campus.  What are the rules in the Grove?  What about the baseball stadium?  I understand the confusion — the rules are still relatively new, and they are different depending on your location on campus.  For readers who have never been to the Grove, and wonder why this is a big deal (it is), we wish you'd come visit us soon.

The University of Mississippi Alcohol Policy was written to conform to local city and county laws.  Lafayette County is a "dry" county (see my explanation at OxfordMississippi.com here) where beer and light wine are prohibited.  The City of Oxford allows beer and light wine.  Additionally, the Alcohol Policy prohibits alcohol consumption in athletic venues during athletic events as well as in academic and administrative buildings unless a licensed caterer does the serving.  That means no alcohol in Vaught-Hemingway Stadium or Swayze Field during games.

Now back to the original questions.  The Grove is outside of Oxford city limits, making possession and/or consumption of beer and light wine against the law.  Across the bridge at Swayze Field, which is within Oxford city limits, beer and light wine are allowed as long as it is kept outside of the stadium walls.

Those who are regulars at campus events know that there is a tendency by enforcement personnel to look the other way in many circumstances.  Even so, now you know that the laws and rules are clear.  See you in the Grove!

Drinking and Driving Isn't Always Illegal

Last night I ran across this report from the Associated Press which purports to detail rates of "drunken driving" or "driving under the influence" throughout the country.  Some highlights:

The upper Midwest has the worst drunken driving rates in the country, according to a government report that says 15 percent of adult drivers nationally report driving under the influence of alcohol in the previous year.

The report on drunken driving relies on data obtained from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The survey, based on a scientific random sample of households, asked 127,283 adults in 2004, 2005 and 2006 whether they had driven under the influence in the past year.

Interesting.  Seems that a government researcher asked a bunch of adults if they have had a drink and driven, about one in seven reported they had.  Well, drinking and driving isn't necessarily illegal.  Only at the very end does this story qualify the "data" by stating:

It's illegal to drive with a blood alcohol level of 0.08 percent or higher.

In the past decade, the number of impaired drivers involved in alcohol-related crashes has remained relatively stable — from 12,348 in 1996 to 12,491 in 2006. Those figures cover drivers with a blood-alcohol level of 0.08 percent or higher.

The AP story simply adds to the negative press surrounding alcohol and driving, ignoring the fact that there are responsible adults all over the country who may have one or two drinks after work and head home - with their BAC under the legal limit.  In Mississippi, as in the rest of the country, a DUI arrest doesn't have to lead to a DUI conviction.  If you have been charged with a DUI, you need to evaluate your rights and your options.  Feel free to call me at 662.638.4089 or visit my website at www.kevinwfrye.com.

2008 Mississippi Legislative Session Update

This post will begin a continuing series about bills passed by the 2008 Regular Session of the Mississippi Legislature concerning both substantive and procedural criminal law. 

House Bill [HB] 19 -
Intensive Supervision Program Extended

This bill extended the "house arrest" program (an alternative sentence to incarceration in a prison facility) until June 30, 2012.  It also raised the program fee to $80/month.

HB 359 - Justice Court Expungement Fees

Section 25-7-25 of the Mississippi Code allows the Mississippi Justice Courts to charge $50.00 for the dismissal of any criminal charge, complaint or affidavit.  The 2008 amendment will allow them to also charge the $50.00 fee for expungements.

HB 519 - Registered Sex Offenders

Section 45-33-25 of the Mississippi Code requires convicted sex offenders to report where they live as well as restricting where they may live.  The 2008 amendment forbids convicted sex offenders from living within 1,500 feet of a residential child-caring agency, a children's group care home or any playground, ball park or other recreational facility utilized by persons under the age of eighteen (18) years. Limited exceptions are incorporated into the bill and include: (a) having established the residence prior to July 1, 2008, (b) the offender is serving a sentence at a jail, prison, juvenile facility or other correctional institution, (c) the offender is subject to an order of commitment, and (d) the offender is a minor or a ward under a guardianship.

More summaries of laws passed during the 2008 Regular Session of the Mississippi Legislature will be posted soon.

As always, should you find yourself in need of legal advice or assistance, please feel free to call me, James B. Justice, at the law office of Justice & Alexander, P.A. in Oxford, Mississippi at (662) 234-4747.

Alcohol/Drug Counseling Program Expands

Sue Lynn Mills of the Oxford Eagle filed this report yesterday detailing the outgrowth of the University of Mississippi's BASICS alcohol and drug intervention program in the form of Brief Intervention and Screening for the Community (BISC) and Substance Abuse Services.  The currently existing BASICS intervention program is mandated by the Court in DUI and other alcohol related cases involving students.  The BISC program is intended to serve the wider community - specifically those offenders not enrolled at Ole Miss. 

My understanding of the BASICS program is that counselors work with students to learn how to be responsible when they consume alcohol, and for the few students with a clear drinking problem, to discontinue the consumption of alcohol altogether.  I have had a number of conversations recently centering on the responsibility of alcohol consumption, with clients, students and local residents alike.  I am certainly in favor of a program that is intentional in teaching responsibility rather than over-reacting and/or advocating zero tolerance.  My clients suggest that the BASICS intervention program can be helpful, and I look forward to the added opportunity that BISC may provide to my non-student clients.

Marijuana Possession Penalties in Mississippi

In Mississippi, prosecution for marijuana possession may indeed be serious, and even misdemeanor convictions may have an adverse impact on your driver's license and your future employment opportunities.  Penalties for marijuana possession in Mississippi vary widely based upon the amount or weight of marijuana you are found guilty of possessing and whether or not you have previous convictions. 

Possession of marijuana in an amount equal to 30 grams or less generally leads to prosecution for a misdemeanor, while possession of larger amounts leads to prosecution for a felony.  Penalties range from small fines for first-offense misdemeanor convictions, generally between one hundred and two hundred and fifty dollars, to heavy penalties for some first-offense felony convictions, up to thirty years in prison or a fine between five thousand and one million dollars, or both. 

Keep in mind that there are a number of factors which must be established by the prosecution at trial in order to obtain a conviction for marijuana possession.  Prosecutors must prove, among other things, that the substance seized was in fact marijuana, and not some other substance, and they must establish the amount or weight of the substance seized.

For additional reading, here is an interesting post from Jamie Spencer of the Austin Criminal Defense Lawyer detailing the first ever marijuana arrest in the United States.

Regional Criminal Law News

This is the first weekly roundup of criminal law news from Lafayette County, Marshall County, Panola County and Union County. 

Alyssa Schnugg of the Oxford Eagle wrote
this article about Judge Andrew Howorth's denial of a new trial for former Ole Miss student David Jackson Williams, who in October 2007 was found guilty of the murder of fellow student Demetria Bracey and sentenced to life in prison.  The new trial was requested by appellate counsel for Mr. Williams, David Hill, who plans to appeal the Court's decision to the Mississippi Supreme Court.

Emily Williams of The Panolian filed
this report detailing actions taken in Batesville Municipal Court on Wednesday, including disposition of the following matters: possession of a controlled substance; two DUI's; shoplifting; contempt of court; public drunk; open container; and possession of paraphernalia.

The South Reporter had this story from Holly Springs rounding up the week's criminal law news, including details about a grand larceny investigation and two arrests for possession of a controlled substance.

Third Judicial District Drug Court Convenes

The Third Judicial District Drug Court convened for the first time yesterday at 4:00 p.m. in the Lafayette County Chancery Building.  The availability of the Drug Court provides an alternative to incarceration for defendants charged with certain drug related crimes.  Third Judicial District Circuit Court Judge Andrew Howorth presided as three defendants plead guilty to various offenses with the understanding that they will be entering the Drug Court rehabilitative treatment program for alcohol and/or drug addiction.  Unlike traditional procedure in Circuit Court, where a guilty plea to a felony results in the punishment of incarceration or probation, Drug Court provides a rehabilitative option.  This distinction between punishment and rehabilitation most distinguishes Drug Court from the traditional Circuit Court procedure.

Successful completion of the Drug Court program offers many offenders the opportunity to have the charges against them dismissed, their sentence reduced or set aside, and usually results in lesser penalties.  The Drug Court program places stringent requirements on defendants by requiring them to sign a "Drug Court Contract" which outlines a number of commitments that must be made, including: full participation in long-term alcohol and/or drug treatment (to include 12-step meetings and twice-a-week drug testing); attendance at all court mandated meetings; payment of fees and fines as directed by the court; and, agreement not to use or possess drugs or alcohol, or associate with any persons who use or possess drugs.  Additionally, Drug Court personnel may make surprise visits to the defendant's home or place of work to check for drug and/or alcohol use.  If the defendant does not successfully complete the drug court program he or she will re-enter the traditional punishment-based court system.

Persons entering the Drug Court treatment program will generally meet with Judge Howorth each Thursday at 4:00 p.m.  At the close of the Hearing, Judge Howorth addressed each defendant, encouraging them to use the Drug Court process as a path to "regain control of [their] life."

Should promoting "excessive thinness" be a crime...

Updated as noted below

Alright, admittedly this post is from left field and a topic not related to Mississippi, but I couldn't help but be taken aback when I stumbled upon a story about efforts in France to criminalize promoting "excessive thinness" and "extreme dieting" in The Christian Science Monitor, found here.  Let me immediately say that I agree that eating disorders are bad for individuals, and I even agree that society often puts an emphasis on young people to conform to a certain image — I just don't think criminal penalties are the answer.  This, in my view, is the wrong way to address an important issue.  Any comments (without picking on France)?

Update:

In my original post yesterday I noted that this was a topic unrelated to Mississippi — however, after a little more thought, I remembered that earlier this year some of our own lawmakers attempted to ban fast food restaurants from serving obese customers, story found here.  These two proposals are an interesting lesson in extremes.

If I am arrested for a crime, what happens to me next?

The legal system has a strict set of rules that govern investigation, prosecution, adjudication and punishment of persons charged with criminal offenses.  These rules are commonly known as the rules of "criminal procedure."  For lawyers, judges, prosecutors and other court personnel, the progression of a criminal case is natural and well understood, but I often find that my clients are unsure and confused about what to expect as their cases move forward.  Below is a brief outline and summary of the steps in a typical criminal case:

1.    Arrest: can be made with or without a warrant;
2.    Initial Appearance: the defendant is informed of the nature of the charges against him, his rights under the Fifth Amendment, his right to counsel, his right to a preliminary hearing and the conditions under which he may be released;
3.    Entry of Counsel;
4.    Preliminary Hearing: (this hearing may be waived by the defendant) the defendant may confront his accusers, a determination is made regarding whether sufficient probable cause exists to move the case forward, and, in some cases a determination is made regarding the conditions of release through trial;
5.    Indictment: made by the grand jury, this is the formal written accusation of the crime which is presented to the court;
6.    Arraignment: this is the hearing where the defendant enters either a plea of guilty or not guilty to the charges made in the indictment;
7.    Discovery, Pre-Trial Motions, Pre-Trial Hearing: this is the time period where the defendant's attorney exchanges information with the prosecution relating to the charges and prepares for trial;
8.    Trial;
9.    Appeal: if convicted, the defendant is generally entitled to an appeal.

Again, this is a very brief outline — there is much more to be said about each step, and I will continue to add posts on the topic of criminal procedure.  Because each step can be critical to the outcome of your case, it is important to consult with counsel as quickly as possible following an arrest.

What other legal bloggers are saying about DUI defense...

There are a number of lawyers in other states blogging about criminal law — over time I will point out some of their outstanding posts.  Today I wanted to introduce you to two lawyers and their excellent blogging on DUI defense.  Now, I don't necessarily agree with all of the opinions expressed in these posts, and it must be noted that local practice varies from court to court and that these posts certainly weren't written with the idea of defending a Mississippi DUI in mind — with that said let's dig in.

Steven Eversole publishes the Alabama DUI & Criminal Defense Law Blog.  He recently began a multi-part post titled "20 Ways to Fight your DUI and Win" - the first post is here and the second post is here (I'll update you as he continues).  Steven's first point, that "Factors Other Than Alcohol Can Cause Poor Performance On DUI Field Sobriety Tests", is one of the most important.  In initial interviews my DUI clients, almost without fail, want to discuss the difficulty of the Field Sobriety Test and whether it is a good indicator of intoxication.  As Steven points out in his fifth point, Field Sobriety Tests are often a poor measure of impairment.  Thus, I always carefully compare my client's recollection of the Field Sobriety Test with the version found in the arresting officer's report, frequently finding inconsistencies.  These inconsistencies can form the foundation of a successful DUI defense.

Jamie Spencer publishes the Austin DWI Lawyer.  A few months back he posted a brief but insightful post about innocence versus guilt in a DUI case, found here.  I agree with Jamie's ultimate point — there is a very fine line in the eyes of the law between a DUI conviction and acquittal.  All the more reason to carefully weigh all of your options when facing a DUI charge.

Drive-By Shooting in Lafayette County

Excerpted from today's Oxford Eagle Crime Report:


    A Lafayette County woman was arrested Monday and charged with drive-by shooting

for an incident that occurred Saturday, according to the Lafayette County Sheriff's

Department.

    Kimberly Johnson, 37, of Suncrest Drive was picked up on a warrant Monday by

deputies and taken to the Lafayette County Detention Center where she was booked

without a bond pending a first appearance hearing.

    Investigator Scott Mills said Johnson was one of two suspects being charged with

shooting at a female victim in the Brittany Woods subdivision on Saturday, although no

one was injured.


According to Mississippi Statute Section 97-3-109, a person is guilty of the felony of
drive-by shooting if she attempts,
other than for lawful self-defense, to cause serious
bodily injury to another, or causes such injury purposely, knowingly
or recklessly under
circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life by discharging a firearm
while in or on a vehicle. A person convicted of drive-by shooting shall be
punished by a prison term not to exceed thirty
(30) years and a fine not to exceed Ten
Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00).

Everything Scruggs

I realize that there is much interest right now, in Mississippi and beyond, for news about the ongoing story of Richard Scruggs and his associates.  Most readers will be familiar with at least some details of the criminal prosecution of Mr. Scruggs.  The Scruggs story is receiving great coverage at the following sites, and thus I will not spend any time on the issues.  If you're at all interested in this topic, check out folo or the Insurance Coverage Law Blog.

"Changing the Culture": Ole Miss Alcohol Policy & Two Strikes Rule

Over the past few years The University of Mississippi has spent a great deal of time and resources working to combat a "culture of alcohol" on its Oxford campus.  Last year those efforts resulted in the adoption of an Alcohol Policy, found here and a Two Strikes Rule, found here.

The Alcohol Policy generally outlines prohibited acts on and off campus for students and prohibited acts on campus for visitors.  Highlights include the designation of "plain view" or "unattended" alcohol as falling into the category of alcohol distribution, which is prohibited, and the ban of beer and light wine (but not liquor) in the Grove.

The Two Strikes Rule requires that a first offender attend alcohol and/or drug education, generally a program called BASICS, and that the student be placed on probation for the current semester and the two following semesters.  A second offense results in a one semester suspension, which can be made effective immediately.  Off-campus conduct in violation of University policy that occurs within Lafayette County may also result in adverse action under this policy.

Many of my clients are students who are worried about the effect of a DUI, drug or other charge on their academic careers.  Because I feel that continued enrollment in school is of the utmost importance, I make a point of addressing these concerns with my clients at the outset of my representation.  If you have been charged with a DUI or other crime as a student at Ole Miss it is important that you seek legal representation to protect your rights both on and off-campus.  Feel free to contact me to arrange an appointment at 662.638.4089 or
www.kevinwfrye.com

Third Judicial District Drug Court Begins Taking Cases

The newly formed Third Judicial District Drug Court is set to hear its first cases on Thursday, April 17, 2008, in the Lafayette County Chancery Building.  The Drug Court will take cases from throughout the Third Judicial District, which includes the following counties: Lafayette, Marshall, Benton, Tippah, Union, Calhoun and Chickasaw.  You can read Alyssa Schnugg's story in the Oxford Eagle here.  I will be attending Thursday's inagural hearings and will post additional information later this week.

Implied Consent - What happens to my license if I don't consent?

In a typical scenario, when a law enforcement officer believes someone is driving a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, the officer will begin by observing the driver and asking him questions.  This is usually followed by a request for the driver to submit to field sobriety testing and/or a portable breathalyzer.  The final step in the officer's investigation will be to place the driver into custody and transport him or her to the police station or sheriff's department where the officer will request that the driver submit to a breath test.  In Mississippi, every law enforcement agency uses the Intoxilyzer 8000 (I am unaware of any exceptions).  Mississippi statutory law lays out what happens to a person's driver's license whether he or she takes the breath test or refuses it (the numbered sections below only summarize what the statutes require, see below for more information) :

(1) If you take the breath test (and have a valid driver's license)  -

Under Mississippi Code Annotated Section 63-11-23(2), if you submit to the breath test and register a blood alcohol concentration of .08% or higher for those of legal drinking age or .02% or higher for those below the legal drinking age, then the officer will take your license and give you a receipt that is valid as a driving permit for 30 days.  This 30 day permit may be extended for up to two additional 30 day periods (for a total of 90 days) should the driver or his attorney make a written request for a trial within each 30 day period.  Should you request a trial and/or extension and receive a permit to drive and your case not go to trial within the 90 days, then the Mississippi Commissioner of Public Safety can suspend your license for 90 days.

(2) If you don't take the breath test (and have a valid driver's license)  -

Under Mississippi Code Annotated Sections 63-11-21 and 63-11-23(1), if you refuse to take the breath test, then the officer will submit a sworn report to the Mississippi Commissioner of Public Safety and the Mississippi Commissioner of Public Safety's office will review the sworn report to determine whether: (a) the law enforcement officer had reasonable grounds and probable cause to believe the person had been driving a motor vehicle upon the public highways, public roads and streets of this state while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any other substance which may impair a person's mental or physical ability; (b)  the person refused to submit to the test upon request of the officer; and (c) the person was informed that his license and/or driving privileges would be suspended or denied if he refused to submit to the chemical test.  Usually, the  Mississippi Commissioner of Public Safety's office will find that these requirements have been met and will send the driver a notice pursuant to Mississippi Code Annotated 63-1-52(2)(a).  30 days after the notice has been sent, the Mississippi Commissioner of Public Safety will suspend the person's driver's license for a period of 90 days.  The Commissioner's determination may be reviewed by a court pursuant to Mississippi Code Annotated Section 63-11-25 within 10 days after the decision is rendered.

(3)
If you take or don't take the breath test (and DO NOT have a valid driver's license)  -

Under Mississippi Code Annotated Section 63-11-23(3), if you are a Mississippi resident and do not have a license or permit to drive a motor vehicle, then the Mississippi Commissioner of Public safety will not issue you a license or permit for 1 year after the 30 day notice is sent pursuant to Mississippi Code Annotated 63-11-52(2)(a).

————————————
Every DUI case is different.  The numbered sections above only summarize the Mississippi statutes on taking or refusing the breath test.  If you find yourself in the unfortunate position of being accused of DUI in Mississippi or having your license suspended under the Mississippi Implied Consent Law, then please feel free to contact me to discuss your case or to make an appointment by e-mailing me at jamesbjustice@gmail.com or by calling my office at (662) 234-4747.

Implied Consent - An Overview

The laws that govern driving under the influence (DUI) and/or driving while intoxicated (DWI) are found in Mississippi Code Annotated Section 63-11-1 et seq., which is formally known as the "Mississippi Implied Consent Law".  Anyone who drives a motor vehicle upon "the public highways, public roads and streets" of Mississippi is considered to have given their consent to a chemical test (or tests of their blood, breath or urine) for the purpose of determining alcohol  concentration or to determine whether any other substance is present in the driver's system that might impair their ability to operate a motor vehicle.  See Mississippi Code Annotated Section 63-11-5.  This idea is referred to as "Implied Consent".  Therefore, under this law, if a person drives any motorized vehicle (including not only cars and trucks but also four wheelers, golf carts and other motorized modes of transportation) the law presupposes that the driver will consent to a test to determine the level of concentration of alcohol or other substances in the driver's body that might impair their ability to drive a motor vehicle.  Law enforcement officers must have reasonable grounds and probable cause to believe that the person was driving or had actual physical control of a motor vehicle upon a public roadway while under the influence of alcohol or another impairing substance.  The officer must also be certified to administer the test or tests given.  There are a number of other laws, court opinions and regulations concerning the specific tests given, which will be discussed at greater length in the future.

If you find yourself in the unfortunate position of being accused of DUI or DWI in Mississippi, then please feel free to contact me by e-mail at jamesbjustice@gmail.com or by phone at (662) 234-4747 to discuss your case or make an appointment.

DUI's are for famous people too...

Early this morning Carmelo Anthony of the NBA's Denver Nuggets was arrested for suspicion of DUI in Denver, Colorado, after failing a series of sobriety tests.  The full story can be found here. This news, along with my previous post detailing the number of DUI arrests in Oxford over the weekend, simply serves as a reminder that it can happen to you. Once again, drive safely.  But if you do happen to run into trouble, give me a call and we will work together to resolve your case.

Local News: Weekend DUI Arrests in Oxford Numerous

This past weekend in Oxford was eventful in many ways.  The annual Grove Bowl with new coach Houston Nutt was held Saturday setting an attendance record and our baseball team beat LSU two games to one to win the weekend.  All this excitement brought many visitors to Oxford, and it seems that the local police forces were ready.

Over the weekend, the Oxford Police Department made 18 DUI arrests.  The word is that many of these arrests came from road blocks set up around town (I will explore the use of road blocks in later posts).  I expect that the local police forces will also be gearing up for the 13th Annual Double Decker Arts Festival in two weeks.  As always, drive safely. 
Technorati Profile.

Field Sobriety Tests: What are the police looking for?

If you have ever been arrested for a DUI you were more than likely asked to take a Standardized Field Sobriety Test.   Most of my clients do take this test, and at our first meeting they always ask me what the police were looking for during the test.  I often hear "I took the test and passed it" or "I did really well."  I always find myself explaining what the police are looking for and why their evaluation of intoxication turned out differently than the client thought.  Often the Standardized Field Sobriety Test is taken in view of a camera mounted in the police cruiser and a video is available to either support or undermine the officer's opinions.

Below is a list of general signs of intoxication which frequently arise in a DUI case, some of them are included in the Standardized Field Sobriety Test used in Mississippi.

    • Odor of alcohol;
    • Red, glassy or bloodshot eyes;
    • Slurred, mumbled, confused or contradictory speech;
    • Walk and Turn Test: cannot keep balance, starts too soon, stops walking, steps off line, wrong number of steps and improper turn; and
    • One Leg Stand Test: cannot keep balance, swaying, hopping and putting foot down before completion.

After a DUI arrest the arresting officer will complete an arrest report which includes an evaluation of these signs.  This arrest report, along with the video if one was made, is made available to me during the discovery process prior to your court date.  The information provided in the arrest report is critical in my evaluation of your case and ultimately in the court's decision of whether to find you guilty of a DUI.

What is a Controlled Substance?

A "controlled substance" generally is a drug, substance or immediate precursor (the principal compound which is an immediate chemical intermediary used or likely to be used in the manufacture of a controlled substance) which has been given a designation as such by Statute.  Controlled substances are labeled as Schedule I, Schedule II, Schedule III, Schedule IV or Schedule V - use or possession of a controlled substance is not necessarily illegal, such as when you have a valid prescription from your doctor. 

Some common examples of Schedule I controlled substances are heroin, marihuana (marijuana) MDMA and LSD.  Some common examples of Schedule II controlled substances are opium, codeine, hydrocodone, morphine, oxycodone and methadone.

Mississippi criminal law, with some exceptions, declares it unlawful for any person to knowingly or intentionally sell, barter, transfer, manufacture, distribute, dispense or possess with intent to sell, barter, transfer, manufacture, distribute or dispense, a controlled substance; or to create, sell, barter, transfer, distribute, dispense or possess with intent to create, sell, barter, transfer, distribute or dispense, a counterfeit substance.  Penalties for unlawful use or possession of a controlled substance are varied based on the circumstances.

Assault on Ole Miss Campus: Part II

Yesterday I posted a video of an apparent assault on the Ole Miss campus with information relating to the difference between simple and aggravated assault.  The Oxford Eagle (Alyssa Schnugg) provides additional information:

...Marisha M. Porter, 19, of Columbus was charged with aggravated assault for using what police believe was a box cutter to cut three fellow students, according to a statement released late Wednesday by the university. She was taken to the Lafayette County Detention Center and booked on a $20,000 bond. She was bonded out at about 3:30 p.m.

The fight took place at about 11:30 a.m. in the Circle. An ambulance was dispatched to the scene and transported three female victims to Baptist Memorial Hospital-North Mississippi where they were treated for lacerations to the face and arms and released, according to hospital officials.

University Police Department investigators say the brawl was part of an ongoing personal dispute among the women that has been brewing for several days, and may have involved UM basketball player Terrence Watson who was apparently “involved” with two of the women in the fight...

Full story found here.  The Daily Mississippian has this report.  Note that Ms. Porter has been charged with aggravated assault.

"Hardship" Driver's License

Under certain circumstances, a court may choose to grant a "hardship" driver's license to persons who have been convicted of a DUI First Offense.  Hardship licenses may only be granted after service of a 30 day license suspension and may not be granted to those persons who refused to submit to a breath test. 

Application for a hardship license is made by submitting a written petition to the County or Circuit Court in the jurisdiction where you were convicted and it must contain the specific facts which you contend create a hardship.  Generally, a court will grant a hardship license if it finds reasonable cause to believe that the suspension will hinder your ability to continue your employment, continue attending school or an educational institution, or obtain necessary medical care.

Assault on Ole Miss Campus

This video of an apparent assault on the Ole Miss campus prompted me to post the following information relating to the general differences between simple and aggravated assault. Although the quality of this video is rather poor, some may still find it disturbing.



A person may be found guilty of simple assault if she (a) attempts to cause or purposely, knowingly or recklessly causes bodily injury to another; or (b) negligently causes bodily injury to another with a deadly weapon or other means likely to produce death or serious bodily harm; or (c) attempts by physical menace to put another in fear of imminent serious bodily harm; and, upon conviction, she shall be punished by a fine of not more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) or by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than six (6) months, or both.

A person may be found guilty of aggravated assault if she (a) attempts to cause serious bodily injury to another, or causes such injury purposely, knowingly or recklessly under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life; or (b) attempts to cause or purposely or knowingly causes bodily injury to another with a deadly weapon or other means likely to produce death or serious bodily harm; and, upon conviction, she shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than one (1) year or in the Penitentiary for not more than twenty (20) years.

Zero Tolerance for Minors

In certain circumstances Mississippi DUI law treats minors (persons under the age of 21) differently than persons of legal drinking age.  If a minor has a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.02% or more, but lower than 0.08%, penalties may generally be reduced as outlined below.  However, if a minor has a BAC of 0.08% or more she will be treated as an adult. 

A DUI First Offense conviction for a minor is a misdemeanor and will result in a fine of $250.00, a driver's license suspension of 90 days, and required attendance at one or more alcohol safety education programs.  Additionally, the court may require attendance at a victim impact panel.  The court has discretion over whether to "nonadjudicate" a minor's first offense - if the court does nonadjudicate the conviction it is kept confidential and is removed from the minor's record upon reaching the age of 21.


A DUI Second Offense conviction for a minor is a misdemeanor and will result in a fine of not more than $500.00 and a driver's license suspension of 1 year.  The driver's license suspension may be reduced if the minor successfully completes alcohol and/or drug abuse treatment.

A DUI Third Offense conviction for a minor is a misdemeanor and will result in a fine of not more than $1,000.00 and a driver's license suspension lasting either until that person reaches the age of 21 or for 2 years, whichever is longer.  Additionally, alcohol and/or drug abuse counseling is required.

DUI Penalties in Mississippi

Generally, penalties for being convicted of a DUI in Mississippi are as follows:

• A DUI First Offense conviction is a misdemeanor and shall result in a fine of not less than $250.00 and not more than $1,000.00, or imprisonment in jail for not more than 48 hours, or both.  Attendance at a victim impact panel may be substituted for jail time.  Additionally, you will be required to attend and complete one or more alcohol safety education programs.  Finally, your driver's license will be suspended for a period of not less than 90 days.

• A DUI Second Offense conviction is a misdemeanor and shall result in a fine of not less than $600.00 and not more than $1,500.00, imprisonment for not less than 5 days nor more than 1 year, and community service for not less than 10 days nor more than 1 year.  Additionally, your driver's license will be suspended for a period of 2 years.

• A DUI Third Offense conviction is a felony and shall result in a fine of not less than $2,000.00 and not more than $5,000.00 and imprisonment for not less than 1 year nor more than 5 years.  Additionally, the vehicle you were driving may be seized and forfeited.  Finally, your driver's license will be suspended for a period of 5 years.