Felony Convictions & Long-Term Penalties (i.e. The Right to Vote)

I found an interesting post on Underdog by Jon Katz describing a case handed down this week, U.S. v. McCarson.  An excerpt:

When convicted felons are around guns and unlawful drugs, they risk exposure to substantial incarceration time. Lewis D. McCarson learned that when federal marshals came to his girlfriend's home with an arrest warrant for him. U.S. v. McCarson, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 11234 (D.C. Cir. May 27, 2008). Other than the arrest warrant, all went well for McCarson until he told the marshals that he wanted to wear his black pants, coat, and shoes on his way out the door. The marshals went to the bedroom for those articles of closing, and claim they then saw a bag of marijuana and a handgun in plain view and cocaine by the time they further opened the drawer to retrieve the handgun.

One lesson learned here: McCarson's apparel request to the marshals boomeranged back with the rank smell of feces. Because the marshals had an arrest warrant but no search warrant, one is left to wonder whether they would have bothered doing anything to find the gun and drugs had McCarson just agreed to leave the home in his underwear...

The full post, including Katz's lessons number two and three, can be found here.  Staying on the same topic - rights denied to convicted felons - here at home.  The Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal published an article yesterday on felony convictions and voting (sure to be a hot topic in this election year).  The article begins:

When asked about his favorite candidate in this year's presidential race, 31-year-old Steven Hubbard didn't hesitate to say, "Obama's my man."

But that's where his political voice ends. Hubbard, a convicted felon from Tupelo, is one of nearly 150,000 inmates and convicted felons in Mississippi who've lost their right to vote, nearly 7 percent of the state's adult population...

...Mississippi has a procedure that would allow Hubbard to have his rights restored. But with the presidential election less than six months away, some people have begun to wonder about the effect of having so many voting-age Americans disenfranchised, particularly black voters.

According to the Sentencing Project, a nonprofit criminal justice organization engaged in research and advocacy, 48 states and the District of Columbia prohibit inmates from voting while incarcerated on felony offenses. Only Maine and Vermont permit these inmates to vote. Thirty-five states prohibit felons from voting while they are on parole.
The full article can be found here.  If you read the full article, you'll note that it presents points of view from persons both for and against expanding the right of a convicted felon to vote.  The article quotes one person against expanding voting rights, he says:

"We don't let everyone vote - not children, not non-citizens, not the mentally incompetent. There are certain minimum and objective standards of trustworthiness, loyalty and responsibility, and those who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don't meet those standards."
I couldn't leave this statement without some comment.  Equating convicted felons to children, non-citizens or mentally incompetent persons is simply ridiculous - I know that we Mississippians can all think of examples (very recent examples) of intelligent people who are also convicted felons.  I also think this guy assumes too much when he implies that all persons who are NOT convicted felons are trustworthy, loyal and responsible.  Not true.  I see no rational relationship between a felony conviction and responsible voting, they simply have nothing to do with each other.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.