﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title>Mississippi Criminal Defense Law Blog: Recent Comments</title>
	<updated>2008-07-27T02:33:45Z</updated>
	<id>http://mscriminallawblog.com/comments/atom.aspx</id>
	<link rel="self" href="http://mscriminallawblog.com/comments/atom.aspx" />
	<link rel="alternate" href="http://mscriminallawblog.com" />
	<generator uri="http://app.onlinequickblog.com/" version="2.0">Quick Blog</generator>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Regional Criminal Law News: Cause of Death Investigated</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://mscriminallawblog.com/2008/05/02/regional-criminal-law-news-cause-of-death-investigated.aspx#comment-1222665" />
		<id>tag:mscriminallawblog.com,2008-07-24:1222665</id>
		<author>
			<name>Donald Taylor</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2008-07-24T09:57:37Z</updated>
		<published>2008-07-24T09:57:37Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[I need your help in any way you can.  I think something fishy going on with my fathers autopsy. He passed away on April 1, 2008 around 1847 hrs-1730 hrs, and the autopsy report has it was complete on April 2, 2008 on 1730 hrs, seems mighty fast for a busy man.  We had called many times to stress we thought there were some foul play by my step-mother with his medicines and needed to know what was everything in him.  He determined the case as Natural death.  Yes my father had heart problems,sugar, and lupus.  But we needed to know more and unless you know people or law officier, money, or court orders, there is only so much you can do.  I have a few facts that I could get my hands on.  If there is anything you can do or advice you can give me, Please Help.]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on DUI Consequences in Mississippi</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://mscriminallawblog.com/2008/07/01/dui-consequences.aspx#comment-1182222" />
		<id>tag:mscriminallawblog.com,2008-07-09:1182222</id>
		<author>
			<name>Greg Earnest</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2008-07-09T13:49:44Z</updated>
		<published>2008-07-09T13:49:44Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[Really nice website, man. I haven't seen it until today. Good on ya!]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on DUI Consequences in Mississippi</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://mscriminallawblog.com/2008/07/01/dui-consequences.aspx#comment-1176784" />
		<id>tag:mscriminallawblog.com,2008-07-07:1176784</id>
		<author>
			<name>paulquinn</name>
			<uri>http://www.paulquinn.wordpress.com</uri>
		</author>
		<updated>2008-07-07T15:52:39Z</updated>
		<published>2008-07-07T15:52:39Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[One thing I don't understand is why this is for "students." From what I can tell (almost) everyone drinks and drives, only some people get caught. Maybe young people are drinking more, or getting drunker. I think in Oxford and elsewhere cops are profiling when they make dui arrests. Some people are clearly drunk, but when they have an older person on the line cops are more likely to let them go than a 20-something on the same intoxicated line.<br /><br />I also don't think these scare tactics work either. Some people know how serious the consequences are of a dui, or they find out in the process. Smart people simply don't drink and drive, period. Brochures like this are a waste of time and money. If the bar wants to teach about the consequences of dui then get parents and teacher involved, don't put out useless brochures.]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on A DUI Lawyer: Kind of...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://mscriminallawblog.com/2008/05/11/a-dui-lawyer-kind-of.aspx#comment-1126320" />
		<id>tag:mscriminallawblog.com,2008-06-17:1126320</id>
		<author>
			<name>Kevin W. Frye</name>
			<uri>http://www.kevinwfrye.com</uri>
		</author>
		<updated>2008-06-17T13:20:52Z</updated>
		<published>2008-06-17T13:20:52Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[injustice<br /><br />I hate to hear about situations like yours, but I must admit that I have heard many.  The reality is that some attorneys are not as relaible as others.  I always suggest caution when seeking representation - here is a relevant post from another blogger: <a href="http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2008/06/ollie-the-cabdrivertising-criminal-attorney.html">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2008/06/ollie-the-cabdrivertising-criminal-attorney.html</a>.]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on A DUI Lawyer: Kind of...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://mscriminallawblog.com/2008/05/11/a-dui-lawyer-kind-of.aspx#comment-1121631" />
		<id>tag:mscriminallawblog.com,2008-06-15:1121631</id>
		<author>
			<name>injustice</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2008-06-17T12:41:08Z</updated>
		<published>2008-06-15T16:21:42Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[well i had an attorney actually go to court without me, because his secetary told me the wrong date. And guess what I was found guilty.<BR>Very disappointing]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Blogrolling</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://mscriminallawblog.com/2008/05/17/blogrolling.aspx#comment-1097159" />
		<id>tag:mscriminallawblog.com,2008-06-04:1097159</id>
		<author>
			<name>John Leek</name>
			<uri>http://www.cottonmouthblog.blogspot.com</uri>
		</author>
		<updated>2008-06-04T20:46:38Z</updated>
		<published>2008-06-04T20:46:38Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[We've added you too.  Keep it up!]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Felony Convictions &amp; Long-Term Penalties (i.e. The Right to Vote)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://mscriminallawblog.com/2008/05/29/felony-convictions--sentencing-alternatives.aspx#comment-1080634" />
		<id>tag:mscriminallawblog.com,2008-05-29:1080634</id>
		<author>
			<name>Kevin W. Frye</name>
			<uri>http://www.kevinwfrye.com</uri>
		</author>
		<updated>2008-05-29T13:41:39Z</updated>
		<published>2008-05-29T13:41:39Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[Thanks lotus.  And fyi to readers, after some consideration I've decided to turn off the moderation requirement for comments.  Everybody play nice or I'll delete you!]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Felony Convictions &amp; Long-Term Penalties (i.e. The Right to Vote)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://mscriminallawblog.com/2008/05/29/felony-convictions--sentencing-alternatives.aspx#comment-1080487" />
		<id>tag:mscriminallawblog.com,2008-05-29:1080487</id>
		<author>
			<name>lotus</name>
			<uri>http://www.folo.us</uri>
		</author>
		<updated>2008-05-29T12:35:04Z</updated>
		<published>2008-05-29T12:35:04Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[Nice job, Kevin.]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on A DUI Lawyer: Kind of...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://mscriminallawblog.com/2008/05/11/a-dui-lawyer-kind-of.aspx#comment-1079782" />
		<id>tag:mscriminallawblog.com,2008-05-29:1079782</id>
		<author>
			<name>LawMs</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2008-05-29T05:36:12Z</updated>
		<published>2008-05-29T05:36:12Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[I bet I know who it is, not from Oxford, I have watched similar in other cases with this gentleman.  Disappointing to say the least.]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on A DUI Story: Kind of...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://mscriminallawblog.com/2008/05/10/a-dui-story-kind-of.aspx#comment-1038099" />
		<id>tag:mscriminallawblog.com,2008-05-12:1038099</id>
		<author>
			<name>ctr</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2008-05-12T08:16:25Z</updated>
		<published>2008-05-12T08:16:25Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[I hope that guy didn't make that argument to the courts, as a substantive due process challenge to ALL DWI laws.  His analysis suffers from a terrible flaw -- he looks at statistics for how many deaths are caused by drunk drivers, characterizes those numbers as relatively low, and then takes that as evidence for the proposition that the DWI laws have no rational basis.  The gigantic fallacy is that he is looking at the number of deaths WHILE THE LAWS ARE IN EFFECT.  Thus, the drunk driving problem may be small precisely because the laws are working.  Rather than biting off more than he could chew, his guy should have instead focused on the absurdity of a law that criminalizes walking a bicycle on private property while intoxicated.]]></content>
	</entry>
</feed>